Providing Startup Financing Solutions Since 2001

What types of companies is Revenue-based Finance best suited for?

Since most people are only now beginning to discover revenue-based financing they mistakenly assume that it’s an exotic new financing mechanism suitable for a only a small subset of companies. The fact is that it’s a form of financing better suited to the majority of businesses than traditional equity financing. Consider the fact that equity-based financing depends on a profitable liquidity event taking place, such as an IPO or acquisition by a deep-pocketed buyer, to make it worthwhile for the investors.  Then consider how unlikely either of those events really is for the vast majority of companies. The answer is highly unlikely.

The only way for the majority of companies to then create liquidity for an investor is the slow way: by buying back their shares over a number of years.  This is not a very attractive proposition to equity investors.  So why pretend otherwise?

Why not acknowledge this reality and structure the deal so that there’s a schedule in place from the get-go for paying off your financial backers in a timely fashion and getting them out of your hair? This is precisely what revenue-based financing structures such as Revenue Royalty Certificates do. They set out a royalty-based repayment schedule to pay back the principal and interest to the financier.

The benefit here should be obvious. Both parties compromise a bit to get what they want. Since the vast majority of companies will never IPO and at best might be sold for low multiple in the 3x to 5x earnings range, if a buyer can be found at all, they should accept that they will not able to dangle the prospects of a lucrative liquidity event in front of investors. Moreover, investors are typically astute enough to know this is the case.

All  this means is that it’s time for Plan B.  Plan B is revenue-based financing. The company gets the capital it needs to launch or grow. The financial backers in turn understand how they will extract their capital from the company. It will be through a royalty equal to 1 to 5% of the gross revenues each and every month.

As in all cases, pure startups will have to pay more than a company with a track record but a few extra percentage points shouldn’t be an issue if revenue-based financing is the company’s only option for getting the startup capital it needs.

The takeaway here is the revenue-based financing is better suited for the majority of companies than equity-based financing when you accept that few will be able to offer investors a big bang-style exit.


2 Responses to Revenue-based Finance: What Companies Should Consider It?

  • For the past 8 months I’ve been researching seed money or investers I’ve visited many site that are supose to help but I’ve yet to find one. I’ve sent out emails fillid out apts all have responed not interseted. I gues when you come up with a new concep every one is afaid you can look up as many seed or inkubator companys as you want but if they dont understand the concept you will go nowhere. I use face book and micro soft as an example both with new concepts big investers did not want to invest at that time know look at them I’m sure they wish they had. I’ve invested over 50,000 dollars in my site and hundreds of hours but that does not mater to investers it seams when it comes to a new concept there afaird. I am an entrepreneur I started a buisness back in 1993 with $5.00 to my name I’m a sesonal company even in a recession the company is grossing 600.000 k a year and has stayed consistant knowing to in vest in your company and not your pockets will make it grow.I’m still looking for seed or investers on my new ventur capital internet tool with in 5 years should be makeing over 100 million with a new concept you have to belive and see the future.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *